ooble - Out of Brooklyn Lyceum Events

ABOUTooble
- Out Of Brooklyn Lyceum Events
  
  -- As we seek to provide programming
  for when the Brooklyn Lyceum (or any interim proxy) returns,
  we need to see a LOT
  of music, theatre, dance, comedy, etc.
  
  -- To that end, we are accepting invitations
  to see such work
  to investigate if that work (or that group)
  would be a good fit for the Lyceum (or any interim proxy).
  
  -- In addition, we are also open to invitations
  to see work for an actual written review
  (whether or not there is any intent to present at the Lyceum).
  
  We will post the review online, send it to email and social media, where appropriate.
  
  Apply HERE.
  
  -- If that interests you or your group, pursue that at OOBLE.ORG
CONTACTooble
SWAGSelect Artisan works
- COMING SOON.
BEFOREPrior Events
- WHAT HAS GONE BEFORE: Acts that have graced the Lyceum stage. Contact us to tell us someone we have missed.
  
  MUSIC --- dawn landes --- natalia zukerman --- polyphonic spree --- fiona apple --- rebecca pronsky --- seryn --- nadine goellner --- yo la tengo --- duck baker --- citizens --- marc ribot --- black dice --- kelly zullo --- jen chapin
  
  THEATRE --- the nose and the overcoat --- kafka: report to an academy --- 31 bond --- project: ground control --- swampking --- moby dick: the sermon --- wax factory --- bindlestiff family circus --- neofuturists --- richard II --- fallings --- rocky: the musical --- little prinsinn --- charlie brown christmas --- leaving ikea --- salome
  
  COMEDY --- improv summit --- hot sauce --- gentrify brooklyn --- big black car
  
  ART --- janet morgan --- marshall arisman --- surge: nola
  
  DANCE --- chris elam --- yanira castro --- dusan tynek --- all is full of love --- carrie ahern
  
  LYCEUM MARKETS/FESTIVALS --- brooklyn craft market --- brooklyn mutt show --- brooklyn zinefest --- king con brooklyn --- brooklyn blogfest
  
  FILM --- asbury shorts of new york --- brooklyn international film festival --- brooklyn underground film festival
LOCATIONSinterim spots
- We are looking at a couple of interim sites in our other haunts
  
  (New York State, Philadelphia and Maine)
  
  While we wait for the inevitable, either the court accepts:
  
  original legal checkmate
  complaint statutorily abandoned
  based on record provided
  to the Court by the Plaintiff.
  No proof of any communications at all
  w/ defendant Lyceum.
  Complaint abandoned
  by failure to attempt any action.
  
  alternate legal checkmate
  complaint not abandoned by inaction ...
  But failure to serve any motion papers
  on Lyceum Attorney... acts as same ...
  improper notice === failure to act.
  ---court had no authority to rule as
  papers not served on attorney
  never invoke power of the court.
  
  Alternate leading to a Judicial Order on No Notice (JONONO)!
  
  Judicial Orders on No Notice ...have been dealt with harshly...
  in New York State (& other jurisdictions).
  Our situation - decribed! ... jonono.org Judicial Orders On No Notice are a BIIIIIG NONO!!!
  Our/Your mission ... jafomaru.com make so much noise that the court does its job!!
  Your Payback ... gowanagus.com help curate what comes next!!
LyceumDue Process
- BASIC... WORK IN PROGRESS
  
  LowDown - 2 simple things lead to ... a new Brooklyn Lyceum
  
  as the procedural due process legal swamp settles:
  
  All litigants are entitled to .... --#1 Basic 5th grader math skills
  from 4 appellate court judges
  w/ 140 years of combined legal experience.
  --#2 Those same judges addressing,
  after it being brought to their attention
  at oral argument, the utter failure of Plaintiff
  to serve any papers on Lyceum attorney,
  not finding what is impossible if they did so,
  that the Plaintiff timely moved.
  
  HELP US pre-program the return of a
  PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS DEPRIVED Brooklyn theater.
  
  If you think, like us, this is utterly ridiculous,
  Help us as we take action to undo this situation.
  
  NEXT: KNOWDOWN to prepare for Procedural Due Process THROWDOWN/SHOWDOWN!
  
  KnowDown ---- Basic math and basic logic ...
  
  THE GOOD FIGHT : PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS
  
  --Appellate Court, 4 judge panel w/ 140 years combined legal experience,
  slyly made a finding that the Brooklyn Lyceum moved too late
  because the Lyceum's motion, A (served/entered/argued on Oct 17/19/22),
  came AFTER the ENTRY of Judgment of Foreclosure, B (entered Oct 26)
  without ever citing the entry dates of the motion and the Judgment
  (whose entry date does not exist anywhere in the record on appeal).
  
  This is utter horseshit because the standard in New York
  ALWAYS starts and ends with NOTICE OF ENTRY, not just ENTRY.
  Also horseshit because:
  the motion (A) is datetime stamped AFTER the Judgment (B), not before.
  
  By making a finding premised on a bullshit standard
  and factually incorrect even with the bullshit standard,
  you have to wonder, who wrote this decision, why,
  and why it took four months to come up with the bullshit finding?
  
  -- Same court, same ruling, found, with no proof cited,
  that Plaintiff timely moved the 1st motion in case,
  despite the Lyceum raising the failure to serve Lyceum attorney
  at oral argument on appeal before the 4 judges,
  again without citing the dates of any actions or documents.
  
  Bullshit finding that a motion never served on Lyceum attorney
  is timely, or even done at all.
  ThrowDown --- Make noise with us ...
  Club JAFO: Send in affirmation along lines as decribed below. Get a curatorial vote.
  Club MARU: We use any affirmation in court filing. First use of any affirmation gets you another curatorial vote.
  Club JafoMaru: Appear at a JafoMaru Function. More votes based on what the action is.
  prior thoughts on THROWDOWN
  
  --A) READ STATUTE--requiring service of all papers on attorneys.
  --B) READ SHORT TREATISES--
  -- common law v. statute,
  --common law (informal) appearance v. statutory appearance
  --C) READ CASELAW--
  --showing failure to serve attorney never invokes power of the court, vests no rights and has no deadline (statute of limitations) to vacate the decision
  
  --showing informal appearance valid as appearance.
  
  --showing extension of time to answer and service of answer are informal appearances
  
  --D) READ DOCKET--
  --Note that a Plaintiff attorney affirmation swearing no appearance by any Defendant dated ... is attached to a notice of motion dated ... and entered ....
  
  --Note motion decision premised on that affirmation.
  
  --Note date of same attorney affirmation three years later swearing otherwise ... that Plaintiff attorney granted Defendant attorney two extensions of time, multiple oral extensions of time and that Plaintiff rejected Defendant answer back to Defendant Lyceum's attorney.
  
  --Note dates of extensions and service and rejection of answer are prior to date of previous sworn statement of no appearance in support of earlier motion.
  
  --Note same judge premising decision on extensions of time to Defendant Lyceum's attorney.
  
  --Note proofs of service of 1st motion are not on Defendant Lyceum's attorney
  
  --E) ACT--
  --Send Affirmation or notarized Affidavit or notarized Jurat
  
  --Submit caselaw from any jurisdiction (for or against our position)
  
  --Appear live or zoomlike at a hearing
  
  --Appear at event
  
  --F) VOTE ON--
  --Events Lyceum or proxy Lyceum .
  
  --Assisting Other procedural due process cases.
  
  GOWANAGUS.COM
  ShowDown --- Math and Logic and Noise for a new Lyceum!
  BASICS: We need to attack some decisions with some pretty specific arguments that the court exceeded its authority in acting, or had no authority whatsoever, largely due to lack of notice.
  
  ON THE HORIZON:
  With the help of some amount of the populace chiming in with brainstem sunlight, sunlight being the best disinfectant, these are a list of the options we think may be viable:
  1. Motion to reargue appellate panel of 4 judges with 140 years experience finding 17 or 19 or 22 > 26
  2. Motion to reargue appellate panel of 4 judges with 140 years experience failing to address what was raised at oral argumentand clear from the record on appeal, that Plaintiff failed to serve notice of motion on known to Plaintiff attorney for multiple defendants, rendering failure to respond to m otion or appear at oral argument irrelevant.
  3. Motion to appellate court as is allowed when lower court signs an order on no notice,
    failure to serve attorney being no notice.
  4. Motion to appellate court for clarification of exactly how it got Lyceum moved too late.

Add yourself to ooble.org email list.

First Name

Last Name

Email

^

Add my email please!